| In Short: | A dull, aimless and distressingly low-budget zombie affair. |
| Recommended? | No -- unless you’re a die-hard living dead junkie. |
| SEAMUS: | We gotta get these things to learn to eat somethin' other than us! |
I’ve been a fan of the work of George A. Romero for just about
as long as I can remember being aware of cinema. Let’s face it,
the man is a genre legend who revolutionized and reinvented
horror cinema when Night of the Living Dead came
roaring into theaters back in 1968. It was a blistering debut
that attacked issues of race, government and apathy and ended on
a sobering down note that left every character dead. The power
of the film is that it doesn't assign blame. It leaves the
reason for the dead rising veiled in ambiguity and actively
complicates the relationships of the heroes so that it’s
difficult, if you’re honest, to determine just who is in the
right. It’s a deceptively simple setup that yields complex
results. Certainly, 1979’s Dawn of the Dead was a
worthy follow up, though it was also the beginning of his
penchant for more pointed commentary – switching gears, he aimed
his ire at rampant consumerism. 1985’s Day of the Dead
attacks the military industrial complex, 2005’s Land of the
Dead takes aim at the moneyed elite, and 2007’s Diary
of the Dead paints a stark picture of the youthful,
disaffected YouTube culture.
Still, each successive film after Dawn has yielded
proof of the law of diminishing returns. Romero has always been
a man interested in themes and ideas, but he’s been both helped
and hindered by the fact that many viewers are only interested
in the more kinetic, gut-munching aspects of his cinematic
oeuvre.
With Survival of the Dead, Romero’s idea well seems to
have finally run dry. Staged as a spinoff from Diary,
the new film follows a group of rogue national guardsmen led by
Alan Van Sprang as they traverse a post-apocalyptic world that
is peopled with shambling zombies and hobbled by Romero’s lowest
budget yet. Soon, they come across a YouTube-ish video
advertising a hidden oasis called Plum Island – a bucolic
getaway off the coast of Delaware that seems to exist far away
from the menacing cannibalistic ghouls that have overrun the
country. At least, we think they’ve overrun it - we scarcely see
any real zombie threat as our “heroes” make their way to a ferry
manned by Kenneth Welsh. And the zombies themselves are so
reduced as a threat that several characters merely roll their
eyes during their intermittent encounters with them.
Upon reaching Plum Island, this motley crew finds themselves in
the middle of a turf war between two families, clearly borrowed
from the American legend of the Hatfields and the McCoys. Turns
out that the promised sanctuary was built on a lie and that,
yep, there are zombies aplenty on Plum Island. One family
patriarch wants to rehabilitate them, while another wants to
exterminate them.
And that’s pretty much it. While Romero has shown plenty of
ingenuity with cut-rate budgets in the past, he is here just
marking time with one-note characters trapped in the flimsiest
of plots. Van Sprang’s guardsman leader is disturbingly one-note
– he’s a barely sketched badass with no character arc or
throughline that just wanders through the story before heading
on to his next poorly defined adventure. His crew of fellow
guardsmen are defined by single character traits (one’s a
lesbian, one’s religious, one’s a smartass) and become zombie
fodder before any empathy is built for them. The two dueling
families (who for some inane reason speak in heavy Irish accents
despite living off the coast of Delaware) offer little to the
plot aside from the same tired “humanity is its own worst enemy”
shtick that Romero has covered countless times in the past.
Worse yet, the once marvelous practical gore effects that helped
ease viewers’ scorn, engendered by creaky performances and odd
plotting, have now been replaced by slapdash CGI so unconvincing
that it renders the bulk of the film suspenseless. Romero’s
zombies here seem incidental to an already beleaguered story,
and their dispatches have all the gravity of a first generation
Xbox cutscene.
There’s a general sense of boredom and laziness that hangs over
the proceedings, and it’s clear that Romero’s heart is no longer
in it. The enthusiasm and anger that once informed even his
lesser efforts is entirely lacking here, and his notorious
subtext is all but absent. In a recent interview, Romero states
that he plans to do two more films that also spin off from
Diary, but if Survival of the Dead is any
indication of what’s on the horizon, then I think it might be
best for him to pack it in and let the dead stay buried once and
for all.
-- David Rosiak

Survival
of the Dead
Visit our feedback form!